EV Charging Hardware Supplier Landscape
A view of who is investing in EV charging hardware IP, and who files globally. For sales and BD teams selling into charger OEMs, charge-point operators, and vehicle programs: use the ranking to see where automakers, dedicated charging equipment makers, and component suppliers are concentrating R&D, and where that activity crosses borders.
Automakers hold most EV charging patent families. ABB and Siemens are the largest dedicated charging-equipment filers, and most pure-play charger companies file too few international families to rank.
Top 25 by international patent families
| # | Company | HQ | Type | Intl families | Since 2018 | Since 2023 | Filing offices | Intl share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toyota Motor | Japan | Automaker | 616 | 818 | 283 | 13 | 75% |
| 2 | Hyundai Motor Group (incl. Kia) | South Korea | Automaker | 313 | 396 | 116 | 7 | 79% |
| 3 | Honda Motor | Japan | Automaker | 214 | 271 | 42 | 13 | 79% |
| 4 | Ford Global Technologies | United States | Automaker | 175 | 198 | 55 | 8 | 88% |
| 5 | Huawei | China | Charging equipment | 135 | 228 | 122 | 8 | 59% |
| 6 | ABB | Switzerland | Charging equipment | 117 | 174 | 51 | 25 | 67% |
| 7 | Siemens | Germany | Charging equipment | 101 | 145 | 64 | 17 | 70% |
| 8 | LG Electronics | South Korea | Component supplier | 98 | 120 | 47 | 8 | 82% |
| 9 | General Motors | United States | Automaker | 98 | 104 | 35 | 3 | 94% |
| 10 | MAHLE | Germany | Component supplier | 91 | 128 | 52 | 10 | 71% |
| 11 | Audi | Germany | Automaker | 89 | 171 | 40 | 5 | 52% |
| 12 | Panasonic | Japan | Component supplier | 87 | 119 | 27 | 10 | 73% |
| 13 | Bosch | Germany | Component supplier | 81 | 150 | 58 | 12 | 54% |
| 14 | CATL | China | Component supplier | 81 | 124 | 81 | 11 | 65% |
| 15 | Volkswagen | Germany | Automaker | 80 | 180 | 31 | 6 | 44% |
| 16 | Denso | Japan | Component supplier | 72 | 123 | 54 | 8 | 59% |
| 17 | BMW | Germany | Automaker | 64 | 191 | 83 | 7 | 34% |
| 18 | Porsche | Germany | Automaker | 64 | 136 | 21 | 17 | 47% |
| 19 | TE Connectivity | China | Component supplier | 56 | 61 | 32 | 10 | 92% |
| 20 | LG Energy Solution | South Korea | Component supplier | 54 | 76 | 30 | 12 | 71% |
| 21 | Aulton | China | Charging equipment | 52 | 246 | 66 | 21 | 21% |
| 22 | Caterpillar | United States | Charging equipment | 50 | 60 | 42 | 11 | 83% |
| 23 | Rivian | United States | Automaker | 49 | 77 | 17 | 5 | 64% |
| 24 | Phoenix Contact | Germany | Component supplier | 39 | 85 | 34 | 9 | 46% |
| 25 | Innogy | Germany | n/a | 39 | 53 | 0 | 10 | 74% |
Methodology
Patent families first filed in 2018 or later, matched on CPC or IPC codes. “International” means filed in two or more patent offices. Source is Google Patents Public Data via BigQuery.
Codes: CPC and IPC B60L53/3x (charging station construction) and B60L53/68 (charging network operation).
Companies are merged across name variants (for example, several spelling and romanization variants of the same assignee are rolled up into one row). Universities and government research bodies are excluded, so the ranking reflects commercial filers.
Rankings reflect patent activity, not revenue. A heavy filer may be protecting a research program that has not shipped, and a low filer may still be a dominant supplier.
Want this landscape sliced for your product?
If you sell components, materials, or systems into these programs, we can build the account list behind this ranking.